"The Power of the Parental Trump Card: How and Why Frazier v. Winn Got it Right"
Description
This law review conducted by the Chicago-Kent College of Law examines the relationships between free speech, the right of parental choice in a child's upbringing, and the right of the State to establish patriotism in public schools.
"On July 23, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dealt with such a question in Frazier v. Winn. In that case, the court appropriately affirmed that children's right to free speech is only as expansive as their parents allow, justified by the parents' fundamental right to rear their children as they see fit."
Citation: Jocelyn Floyd, The Power of the Parental Trump Card: How and Why Frazier v. Winn Got It Right, 85 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 791 (2010).
"On July 23, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit dealt with such a question in Frazier v. Winn. In that case, the court appropriately affirmed that children's right to free speech is only as expansive as their parents allow, justified by the parents' fundamental right to rear their children as they see fit."
Citation: Jocelyn Floyd, The Power of the Parental Trump Card: How and Why Frazier v. Winn Got It Right, 85 Chi.-Kent. L. Rev. 791 (2010).
Date
2010-08-20
Rights
This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact dginsberg@kentlaw.iit.edu.
Type
Law Review
Language
English